Quote for the Week
The French aristocracy never saw it coming either.
-- Manhattan Mini StorageMeta
Pages
Email
mickarran@yahoo.comTop Posts
- America Has NO Political Parties
- The Myth Of Christmas
- You Can't Have a Substantive Debate Unless You Have Substantive Candidates
- Why Clinton's Pandering Matters
- I Live in NH and Joan Walsh Is Right
- Dem Base Is Not the Tea Party
- "A Republican Ruse"
- Hillary and The Liberals '16 (Updated)
- The Conservative Double Whammy
- The Myths of Christmas
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Blogging from Mick
Blogroll
- alicublog
- American Federation of Teachers
- archy
- Avedon's Sideshow
- Barbara’s Blog
- Black Box Voting
- Cab Drollery
- Center for Economic and Policy Research
- Confined Space
- Corrente
- Crooks and Liars
- democracyforcalifornia
- Eschaton
- Ezra Klein
- Fafblog!
- Firedoglake
- FP Passport
- Hullabaloo
- Inequality Matters
- Informed Comment
- jack*
- James Clay Fuller
- Jon Swift
- Lawyers, Guns and Money
- Liberal Oasis
- mirabile dictu
- newsrack blog
- Obsidian Wings
- Orcinus
- Pruning Shears
- PurpleMinded
- Rogue Columnist
- Sadly, No!
- Sardonicky
- Semidi
- Shakespeare’s Sister
- Shortbus
- Sirotablog
- Swerve Left
- Talk Left
- Talk to Action
- Talking Points Memo
- The Field Negro
- The Fruit Fly
- The Galloping Beaver
- The Greenbelt
- The Zen Cabin
- TomDispatch
- TPMMuckraker
- UnionMaine
- Vagabond Scholar
- Velvel on National Affairs
- Weekly Toll
Fiction
Resources
WordPress Blogs
Categories
Archives
- November 2016
- December 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- April 2012
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.—Martin Luther King Jr.
New On:
Mick’s FB
Daily Archives: December 15, 2006
NeoCondi and Political Fundamentalism
One of the conservatives’ chief traits was on display yesterday when NeoCondi dismissed the ISG’s recommendation that she talk to Syria and Iran. She said she wouldn’t talk to them because:
she did not want to trade away Lebanese sovereignty to Syria or allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon as a price for peace in Iraq, the Post reported.
Apparently, she’d already held both sets of talks in her head and was such a lousy negotiator that she woke up pushed to the wall, clutching her teddy bear and crying “No, no!”
Imagine. We have a Sec of State who has to have it explained to her that having “talks” means you, like, you know, talk. They try to get as much from you as they can, you try to get as much from them as you can, and you wind up, like, meeting somewhere in the middle – you know, compromising.
But that’s not how NeoCondi does things, no. She decides in advance what they’re going to say and then rejects it. Neocons don’t talk. They give orders. They “decide” things, preferably with as little exposure to contrary ideas as possible. Contrary ideas are “negative”, show “weakness”, and distract you from the pre-conceived goal.
Neo-conservatives think “talking” is a waste of time. They know the truth, so what’s the point? They’re authoritarians and like to give orders rather than “discuss” (another weenie-word). They’re bi-polar – there are no grays for conservatives. Everything is still in black-and-white, like old movies.
- If you’re not “good” as I define it, you must be “evil”.
- If you’re not with me, you’re against me. (see, Bush)
- Stealing an office pencil is the same as murder because they’re both against the law.
And, of course, they hate listening to people who disagree with them. They have a felt-type of knowing. They know something because it feels right to them so therefore it must be true. They hate being suibjected to people with different opinions but they hate being exposed to facts that question their “knowing” even more.
This impatience or inability to cope with nuance and facts not contained in their subconscious “knowing”, even in its simplest forms, makes them extremely dangerous if they’re allowed beyond the confines of their neatly-ordered bubble-world, whichever one that might be (all conservatives have them). They’re in denial about all complexity no matter how minor. They are the people who take a trip to France or Germany and constantly complain that “nobody speaks English”. They are the people who just don’t understand why the poor don’t get off their asses and get rich like them or why the Iraqis just won’t “step up to the plate” and take this mess off our hands.
But it needs must be clearly understood that their rigid inflexibility never applies to themselves. Inside their bubble, morality applied to their lives and decisions is forever elastic, stretching to accommodate the most venal of actions and thoughts. It is a sin and a crime for someone else to steal a pencil but they are allowed to commit murder if it furthers their interests. Then the rationalizations flow like bourbon and branch water.
Conservatives are the kind of people who shouldn’t be allowed out of the house without a minder to explain everything to them. They are astoundingly ignorant about life outside the bubble. Put NeoCondi on the world stage and she’s clueless – and helpless. She can pass along Emperor George’s dictums but she isn’t allowed to negotiate because a) she doesn’t know what it means, b) she already knows what everybody’s going to say, and c) she’d have to listen to people who have a different view and that would be painful.
Old-style moderate conservatism wasn’t quite that bone-headed. Bob Michel, James Baker, Henry Hyde before the impeachment – they were all willing to talk, all willing to compromise if they had to. But to King George and NeoCondi “compromise” is a dirty word. They are political fundamentalists. Their truth is the only Truth and they’re going to ram it down out throats if it takes another millenium. That’s strength. That’s commitment. That’s “purpose”.
That’s hubris, arrogance, and elitism taken to its outer fringe. Gawd he’p us, we got 2 more years of this insanity before our parole hearing comes up.
Posted in Conservatism